Access sac.digital. Sistema de Atendimento por WhatsApp

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

11/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,080 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.5 s

3/100

10%

sac.digital

603 ms

sac.digital

1591 ms

matomo.js

998 ms

js

74 ms

styles.css

144 ms

Our browser made a total of 140 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (102 requests) were addressed to the original Sac.digital, 19% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (2 requests) were made to Analytics.clientesonline.com.br. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Sac.digital.

Content Size

5.7 MB

After Optimization

5.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Sac.digital main page is 5.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 191.4 kB

Original 228.1 kB
After minification 218.9 kB
After compression 36.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 191.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 102.4 kB

Original 4.5 MB
After minification 4.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sac images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 150.9 kB

Original 768.4 kB
After minification 706.9 kB
After compression 617.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 150.9 kB or 20% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 26.7 kB

Original 163.1 kB
After minification 162.8 kB
After compression 136.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sac.digital needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 26.7 kB or 16% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 98 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sac. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 43 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 28 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.