Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 82

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 71% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

safetuk.org

safetuk.org -

Page Load Speed

6.9 sec in total

First Response

29 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

5.5 sec

About Website

Visit safetuk.org now to see the best up-to-date Safetuk content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about safetuk.org

Visit safetuk.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Safetuk.org page load time and found that the first response time was 29 ms and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

safetuk.org performance score

82

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value110 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.4 s

83/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

safetuk.org

29 ms

safetuk.org

341 ms

style.min.css

95 ms

css

32 ms

style.css

91 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 94% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Safetuk.org, 4% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (676 ms) belongs to the original domain Safetuk.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.6 MB (26%)

Content Size

6.1 MB

After Optimization

4.5 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Safetuk.org main page is 6.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 283.2 kB

  • Original 367.2 kB
  • After minification 360.2 kB
  • After compression 84.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 283.2 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-23%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 5.6 MB
  • After minification 4.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Safetuk needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 23% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 121 B

  • Original 50.6 kB
  • After minification 50.6 kB
  • After compression 50.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

  • Original 40.8 kB
  • After minification 40.8 kB
  • After compression 35.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safetuk.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 13% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (22%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

39

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safetuk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

safetuk.org accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

safetuk.org best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

safetuk.org SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    ID

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safetuk.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Safetuk.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Safetuk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: