Report Summary

  • 24

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    43% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

safetyshop.com

UK’s No1 Health and Safety Equipment Suppliers | | Safetyshop

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

12 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

250 ms

About Website

Visit safetyshop.com now to see the best up-to-date Safetyshop content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about safetyshop.com

Only the best safety equipment at market beating prices. Up-to-date valuable information coupled with fast delivery.

Visit safetyshop.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Safetyshop.com page load time and found that the first response time was 12 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

safetyshop.com performance score

24

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.1 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.0 s

6/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.1 s

61/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,300 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.014

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.7 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

safetyshop.com

12 ms

safetyshop.com

30 ms

www.safetyshop.com

26 ms

44e474bf07e378e0a7758d2e12f2c529.css

56 ms

6d892cdb83efb160dfd5d2984bd29676.js

93 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 15% of them (10 requests) were addressed to the original Safetyshop.com, 58% (38 requests) were made to Cdn-01.media-brady.com and 9% (6 requests) were made to Assetscdn-wchat.freshchat.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (794 ms) belongs to the original domain Safetyshop.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 346.8 kB (16%)

Content Size

2.1 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Safetyshop.com main page is 2.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 915.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 234.0 kB

  • Original 263.4 kB
  • After minification 162.3 kB
  • After compression 29.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 101.1 kB, which is 38% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 234.0 kB or 89% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 22.0 kB

  • Original 768.4 kB
  • After minification 746.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Safetyshop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 89.8 kB

  • Original 915.6 kB
  • After minification 915.6 kB
  • After compression 825.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 980 B

  • Original 160.8 kB
  • After minification 160.8 kB
  • After compression 159.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Safetyshop.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (32%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Safetyshop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 14 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

safetyshop.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[role] values are not valid

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

safetyshop.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

safetyshop.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Safetyshop.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Safetyshop.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Safetyshop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: