Access sagittamr.com. Market Research Agencies UK | Quantitative Consumer Market Research Kent

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

13/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.9 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.302

39/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.7 s

57/100

10%

www.sagittamr.com

768 ms

style.css

4 ms

language-selector.css

7 ms

style.min.css

29 ms

style.css

31 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Sagittamr.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Ssl.google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (777 ms) belongs to the original domain Sagittamr.com.

Content Size

158.0 kB

After Optimization

118.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Sagittamr.com main page is 158.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 77.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 21.9 kB

Original 28.8 kB
After minification 27.7 kB
After compression 6.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.9 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 716 B

Original 32.9 kB
After minification 32.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sagittamr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 11.2 kB

Original 77.0 kB
After minification 77.0 kB
After compression 65.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 11.2 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-28%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

Original 19.3 kB
After minification 19.2 kB
After compression 13.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sagittamr.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.5 kB or 28% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sagittamr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.