Access saroop.com. Yahoo | Mail, Weather, Search, Politics, News, Finance, Sports & Videos

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

15/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.1 s

13/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value6,340 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.4 s

9/100

10%

saroop.com

183 ms

saroop1

338 ms

yahoo.com

63 ms

yahoo.com

142 ms

www.yahoo.com

849 ms

Our browser made a total of 128 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Saroop.com, 64% (82 requests) were made to S.yimg.com and 7% (9 requests) were made to Yahoo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Yahoo.com.

Content Size

1.2 MB

After Optimization

604.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Saroop.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 788.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 597.7 kB

Original 788.5 kB
After minification 788.2 kB
After compression 190.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 597.7 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

Original 288.3 kB
After minification 284.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Saroop images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 503 B

Original 78.6 kB
After minification 78.5 kB
After compression 78.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 718 B

Original 51.1 kB
After minification 51.1 kB
After compression 50.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Saroop.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

113

After Optimization

The browser has sent 113 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Saroop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 55 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.