Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

scanivalve.com

Scanivalve - Intelligent Pressure and Temperature Instrumentation

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

165 ms

Resources Loaded

2.9 sec

Page Rendered

1 sec

About Website

Welcome to scanivalve.com homepage info - get ready to check Scanivalve best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about scanivalve.com

Scanivalve's line of pressure and temperature measurement equipment serve applications in aerospace, building pressure, wind tunnels, and more.

Visit scanivalve.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Scanivalve.com page load time and found that the first response time was 165 ms and then it took 3.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

scanivalve.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.3 s

18/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.2 s

5/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.7 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value230 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.03

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

43/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

scanivalve.com

165 ms

scanivalve.com

1377 ms

colorbox-1.css

177 ms

formidableforms.css

264 ms

style.min.css

260 ms

Our browser made a total of 68 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (63 requests) were addressed to the original Scanivalve.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Platform-api.sharethis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Scanivalve.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 4.6 MB (19%)

Content Size

24.4 MB

After Optimization

19.9 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Scanivalve.com main page is 24.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 23.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 133.8 kB

  • Original 163.2 kB
  • After minification 161.0 kB
  • After compression 29.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 133.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 4.3 MB

  • Original 23.8 MB
  • After minification 19.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scanivalve needs image optimization as it can save up to 4.3 MB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 65.0 kB

  • Original 202.7 kB
  • After minification 200.7 kB
  • After compression 137.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 65.0 kB or 32% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-29%

Potential reduce by 70.6 kB

  • Original 240.7 kB
  • After minification 240.7 kB
  • After compression 170.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scanivalve.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 70.6 kB or 29% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (68%)

Requests Now

65

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scanivalve. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

scanivalve.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

scanivalve.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

scanivalve.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Scanivalve.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Scanivalve.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Scanivalve. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: