Access scharrenberg.net. Blog sobre yoga, meditación, el bienestar y como cuidarse

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.4 s

16/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.9 s

1/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.8 s

34/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.08

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.0 s

42/100

10%

scharrenberg.net

879 ms

google_service.js

21 ms

style.css

69 ms

dropdowns.js

66 ms

facebook-comments-widgets.css

67 ms

Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (37 requests) were addressed to the original Scharrenberg.net, 13% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 11% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (879 ms) belongs to the original domain Scharrenberg.net.

Content Size

482.4 kB

After Optimization

214.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Scharrenberg.net main page is 482.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 212.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 58.1 kB

Original 74.0 kB
After minification 72.2 kB
After compression 15.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

Original 104.6 kB
After minification 98.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Scharrenberg images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-61%

Potential reduce by 128.6 kB

Original 212.0 kB
After minification 209.3 kB
After compression 83.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 128.6 kB or 61% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 74.6 kB

Original 91.8 kB
After minification 82.4 kB
After compression 17.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scharrenberg.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 74.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 78 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scharrenberg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.