Access scoutripper.com. Scoutripper | Treks, Experiences, Gears & Much More

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value16.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value260 ms

84/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.3 s

15/100

10%

scoutripper.com

117 ms

scoutripper.com

667 ms

vendors.css

58 ms

main.css

122 ms

icofont.min.css

217 ms

Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Scoutripper.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Papayawhip-manatee-789151.hostingersite.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Unpkg.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Scoutripper.com.

Content Size

22.3 MB

After Optimization

19.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Scoutripper.com main page is 22.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 21.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 127.8 kB

Original 142.3 kB
After minification 90.5 kB
After compression 14.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 51.7 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 127.8 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 2.4 MB

Original 21.4 MB
After minification 19.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Scoutripper needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.4 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 279.6 kB

Original 718.5 kB
After minification 718.5 kB
After compression 438.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 279.6 kB or 39% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 5.1 kB

Original 83.9 kB
After minification 83.9 kB
After compression 78.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Scoutripper.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Scoutripper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.