Report Summary

  • 55

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    72% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 42% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 98

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    92% of websites

sedif.com

Accueil • SEDIF

Page Load Speed

10.4 sec in total

First Response

872 ms

Resources Loaded

9.3 sec

Page Rendered

195 ms

About Website

Visit sedif.com now to see the best up-to-date SEDIF content for France and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sedif.com

Créé en 1923, le Syndicat des Eaux d’Île-de-France assure la desserte en eau potable de 4 millions de Franciliens, ce qui en fait le plus grand service public d’eau potable en France.

Visit sedif.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sedif.com page load time and found that the first response time was 872 ms and then it took 9.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sedif.com performance score

55

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.9 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.9 s

23/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.034

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value6.5 s

59/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sedif.com

872 ms

sha1.js

218 ms

thesaurus.js

325 ms

dynlibJsThesaurus.js

221 ms

gaRuntime.js

328 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (62 requests) were addressed to the original Sedif.com, 6% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (6.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Sedif.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 938.3 kB (40%)

Content Size

2.3 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Sedif.com main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 130.2 kB

  • Original 167.5 kB
  • After minification 165.7 kB
  • After compression 37.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 130.2 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 44.9 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SEDIF images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 710.7 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 1.0 MB
  • After compression 325.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 710.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 52.6 kB

  • Original 62.4 kB
  • After minification 42.9 kB
  • After compression 9.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sedif.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.6 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (41%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

39

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SEDIF. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sedif.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sedif.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sedif.com SEO score

98

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FR

  • Language Claimed

    FR

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sedif.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sedif.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of SEDIF. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: