Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

sensix.com

SENSIX | Communications & Event Producer in Montreal

Page Load Speed

1.4 sec in total

First Response

85 ms

Resources Loaded

945 ms

Page Rendered

372 ms

About Website

Welcome to sensix.com homepage info - get ready to check SENSIX best content right away, or after learning these important things about sensix.com

Event producer in Montreal & Toronto. Canada's premiere event producer for custom stage shows & corporate events. Make Sensix your event producer for your event

Visit sensix.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sensix.com page load time and found that the first response time was 85 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sensix.com performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.8 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.6 s

37/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value940 ms

29/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.715

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.0 s

21/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sensix.com

85 ms

sensix.com

165 ms

zenxdesign.css

91 ms

js

50 ms

zenxdesign.js

153 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Sensix.com, 7% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (309 ms) belongs to the original domain Sensix.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 426.6 kB (21%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Sensix.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 40.2 kB

  • Original 48.4 kB
  • After minification 44.0 kB
  • After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 40.2 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 71.9 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. SENSIX images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-41%

Potential reduce by 170.1 kB

  • Original 416.5 kB
  • After minification 416.5 kB
  • After compression 246.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 170.1 kB or 41% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 144.4 kB

  • Original 203.3 kB
  • After minification 177.5 kB
  • After compression 58.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sensix.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 144.4 kB or 71% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (36%)

Requests Now

42

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 42 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of SENSIX. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sensix.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best Practices

sensix.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

sensix.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sensix.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sensix.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of SENSIX. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: