Access seraphicmass.org. My Mass Request

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

56/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.8 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value520 ms

56/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.293

41/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.6 s

29/100

10%

seraphicmass.org

151 ms

mymassrequest.org

119 ms

gtm.js

107 ms

bootstrap.min.css

49 ms

all.css

57 ms

Our browser made a total of 37 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Seraphicmass.org, 73% (27 requests) were made to Mymassrequest.org and 11% (4 requests) were made to Use.fontawesome.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) relates to the external source Mymassrequest.org.

Content Size

1.5 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

In fact, the total size of Seraphicmass.org main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 23.9 kB

Original 31.9 kB
After minification 26.8 kB
After compression 7.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 23.9 kB or 75% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 25.6 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Seraphic Mass images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

Original 90.9 kB
After minification 90.9 kB
After compression 66.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 24.4 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 6.1 kB

Original 25.5 kB
After minification 25.5 kB
After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Seraphicmass.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 6.1 kB or 24% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 26 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Seraphic Mass. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.