Access setup.lighting. Solid wood, natural materials and LED technology

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value15.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value17.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value25.2 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.076

95/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value31.7 s

0/100

10%

setup.lighting

281 ms

www.setup.lighting

2109 ms

custom-style.css

310 ms

public.css

324 ms

sfsi-style.css

537 ms

Our browser made a total of 66 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Setup.lighting, 5% (3 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Player.vimeo.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Setup.lighting.

Content Size

28.6 MB

After Optimization

26.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Setup.lighting main page is 28.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 26.0 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 122.0 kB

Original 146.8 kB
After minification 144.9 kB
After compression 24.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 122.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 66.4 kB

Original 26.0 MB
After minification 25.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Setup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 842.6 kB

Original 1.2 MB
After minification 1.2 MB
After compression 338.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 842.6 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 1.1 MB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.2 MB
After compression 161.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Setup.lighting needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Setup. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 33 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.