Access shaneview.com. ShaneView - Politics, Economics, Society, Standards, Philosophy, Ethics, Poetry, Allegory, Rebuttals

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

61/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

27/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.9 s

82/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value160 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.041

99/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

www.shaneview.com

878 ms

style.css

55 ms

style-Orange.css

54 ms

style.min.css

76 ms

styles.css

56 ms

Our browser made a total of 43 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (40 requests) were addressed to the original Shaneview.com, 5% (2 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net and 2% (1 request) were made to Feeds.feedburner.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (878 ms) belongs to the original domain Shaneview.com.

Content Size

262.6 kB

After Optimization

199.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Shaneview.com main page is 262.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 72.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 52.1 kB

Original 65.9 kB
After minification 63.4 kB
After compression 13.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 52.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 5.3 kB

Original 72.1 kB
After minification 66.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shane View images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 3.5 kB

Original 58.5 kB
After minification 58.5 kB
After compression 55.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 2.1 kB

Original 66.1 kB
After minification 65.9 kB
After compression 64.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shaneview.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shane View. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.