Report Summary

  • 57

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    73% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

shasta.tools

Shasta - Where Technology is a Force for Positive Change

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

132 ms

Resources Loaded

695 ms

Page Rendered

1.9 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Shasta content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about shasta.tools

Where Technology is a Force for Positive Change

Visit shasta.tools

Key Findings

We analyzed Shasta.tools page load time and found that the first response time was 132 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shasta.tools performance score

57

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.2 s

77/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.7 s

85/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,650 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

appmaster.io

132 ms

logo_full.2779212.svg

94 ms

icons.svg

117 ms

header-course.3aaea7e.png

115 ms

us-flag.5edf8c1.svg

113 ms

Our browser made a total of 81 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Shasta.tools and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (300 ms) relates to the external source Appmaster.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 306.9 kB (36%)

Content Size

851.7 kB

After Optimization

544.8 kB

In fact, the total size of Shasta.tools main page is 851.7 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 477.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 306.7 kB

  • Original 374.1 kB
  • After minification 368.9 kB
  • After compression 67.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 306.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 127 B

  • Original 477.6 kB
  • After minification 477.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shasta images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (36%)

Requests Now

80

After Optimization

51

The browser has sent 80 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shasta. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 30 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

shasta.tools accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

shasta.tools best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

shasta.tools SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shasta.tools can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Shasta.tools main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shasta. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: