Report Summary

  • 29

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    49% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 38% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

66 ms

Resources Loaded

1 sec

Page Rendered

491 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sherridress content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sherridress.com

Visit sherridress.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sherridress.com page load time and found that the first response time was 66 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sherridress.com performance score

29

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

29/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.0 s

80/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value590 ms

51/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.713

7/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.1 s

20/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sherridress.com

66 ms

www.sherridress.com

358 ms

styles.css

56 ms

widgets.css

110 ms

jquery.rating.css

96 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (68 requests) were addressed to the original Sherridress.com, 1% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Cdn.livechatinc.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (358 ms) belongs to the original domain Sherridress.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 206.0 kB (10%)

Content Size

2.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Sherridress.com main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 49.0 kB

  • Original 58.4 kB
  • After minification 49.3 kB
  • After compression 9.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 9.1 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 49.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 72.4 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sherridress images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-27%

Potential reduce by 57.0 kB

  • Original 207.6 kB
  • After minification 206.5 kB
  • After compression 150.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 57.0 kB or 27% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-33%

Potential reduce by 27.7 kB

  • Original 84.9 kB
  • After minification 84.7 kB
  • After compression 57.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sherridress.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 33% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (46%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sherridress. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

sherridress.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

sherridress.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

sherridress.com SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sherridress.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sherridress.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sherridress. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: