Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 42

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    61% of other websites

  • 38

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 19% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    70% of websites

shuttersbylindenpaul.com

Bespoke hardwood shutters - Shutters by Linden Paul

Page Load Speed

3.7 sec in total

First Response

239 ms

Resources Loaded

3.3 sec

Page Rendered

190 ms

About Website

Visit shuttersbylindenpaul.com now to see the best up-to-date Shutters By Linden Paul content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about shuttersbylindenpaul.com

Looking for quality hardwood shutters? Get in touch with Shutters by Linden Paul for bespoke shutters and blinds, built to order, with the shortest lead times in the industry. Based in Westerham, Kent...

Visit shuttersbylindenpaul.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Shuttersbylindenpaul.com page load time and found that the first response time was 239 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

shuttersbylindenpaul.com performance score

42

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.6 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value19.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.0 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value180 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.072

96/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

shuttersbylindenpaul.com

239 ms

shuttersbylindenpaul.com

1463 ms

css

31 ms

bootstrap.min.css

635 ms

swiper.min.css

423 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 86% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Shuttersbylindenpaul.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Shuttersbylindenpaul.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (29%)

Content Size

4.5 MB

After Optimization

3.2 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Shuttersbylindenpaul.com main page is 4.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 33.8 kB

  • Original 41.6 kB
  • After minification 34.9 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.7 kB, which is 16% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 33.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 11.9 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Shutters By Linden Paul images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 372.7 kB

  • Original 529.3 kB
  • After minification 464.2 kB
  • After compression 156.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 372.7 kB or 70% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 866.9 kB

  • Original 1.0 MB
  • After minification 867.5 kB
  • After compression 146.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Shuttersbylindenpaul.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 866.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 27 (54%)

Requests Now

50

After Optimization

23

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 50 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Shutters By Linden Paul. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

shuttersbylindenpaul.com accessibility score

38

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

shuttersbylindenpaul.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

shuttersbylindenpaul.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Shuttersbylindenpaul.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Shuttersbylindenpaul.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Shutters By Linden Paul. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: