Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 91

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    91% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 49% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 85

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    55% of websites

signatum.io

Gold IRA Press Release

Page Load Speed

953 ms in total

First Response

50 ms

Resources Loaded

608 ms

Page Rendered

295 ms

About Website

Visit signatum.io now to see the best up-to-date Signatum content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about signatum.io

As the world of finance continually evolves, so do the options available for retirement planning. One investment avenue that has gained sign...

Visit signatum.io

Key Findings

We analyzed Signatum.io page load time and found that the first response time was 50 ms and then it took 903 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

signatum.io performance score

91

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

69/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.0 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

signatum.io

50 ms

gold-ira.html

80 ms

clipboard.min.js

29 ms

image

153 ms

lisa-abble.jpeg

479 ms

Our browser made a total of 11 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 9% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Signatum.io, 36% (4 requests) were made to Blogger.com and 18% (2 requests) were made to Wikipresssource.blogspot.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (479 ms) relates to the external source Blogger.googleusercontent.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 98.1 kB (23%)

Content Size

423.2 kB

After Optimization

325.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Signatum.io main page is 423.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 5% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 247.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 96.8 kB

  • Original 118.6 kB
  • After minification 118.4 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 96.8 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 247.5 kB
  • After minification 247.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signatum images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 57.1 kB
  • After minification 57.1 kB
  • After compression 55.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

9

After Optimization

9

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 9 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signatum. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

signatum.io accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Best Practices

signatum.io best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

SEO Factors

signatum.io SEO score

85

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signatum.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Signatum.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Signatum. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: