Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 80

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 56

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 24% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 62

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    23% of websites

signur.ru

Ультразвуковой расходомер и уровнемер от производителя. ПНП Сигнур

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

520 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

183 ms

About Website

Visit signur.ru now to see the best up-to-date Signur content for Russia and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about signur.ru

Фирма "СИГНУР" производит ультразвуковой расходомер и уровнемер для систем водоснабжения и водоотведения

Visit signur.ru

Key Findings

We analyzed Signur.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 520 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

signur.ru performance score

80

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

95/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.5 s

36/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value190 ms

91/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.005

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.5 s

92/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

signur.ru

520 ms

style.css

129 ms

header1.png

538 ms

header2.png

252 ms

header3.png

380 ms

Our browser made a total of 35 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Signur.ru, 11% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Counter.yadro.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (752 ms) belongs to the original domain Signur.ru.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 28.0 kB (16%)

Content Size

174.9 kB

After Optimization

146.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Signur.ru main page is 174.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 108.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 15.5 kB

  • Original 20.0 kB
  • After minification 17.4 kB
  • After compression 4.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.6 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 77% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 5.0 kB

  • Original 108.3 kB
  • After minification 103.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Signur images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 84 B

  • Original 38.2 kB
  • After minification 38.2 kB
  • After compression 38.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 7.5 kB

  • Original 8.4 kB
  • After minification 7.1 kB
  • After compression 926 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Signur.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.5 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (64%)

Requests Now

33

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 33 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Signur. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

signur.ru accessibility score

56

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

signur.ru best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

signur.ru SEO score

62

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Document uses plugins

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    RU

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    WINDOWS-1251

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Signur.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Signur.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Signur. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: