Report Summary

  • 17

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    32% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

silco.in

Silco Control Cables | Automotive Control Cables Manufacturers in India

Page Load Speed

2.6 sec in total

First Response

14 ms

Resources Loaded

2.3 sec

Page Rendered

329 ms

About Website

Welcome to silco.in homepage info - get ready to check Silco best content right away, or after learning these important things about silco.in

SILCO Cables is a leading manufacturer of Automotive Control Cables in India. We provide a wide range of Automotive Control Cables for motorcycles, mopeds, scooters, three-wheelers, and commercial veh...

Visit silco.in

Key Findings

We analyzed Silco.in page load time and found that the first response time was 14 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

silco.in performance score

17

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.2 s

8/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value22.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.0 s

6/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,230 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.1 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

silco.in

14 ms

silcoautomotive.in

138 ms

style.min.css

30 ms

wc-blocks-vendors-style.css

60 ms

wc-blocks-style.css

106 ms

Our browser made a total of 111 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Silco.in, 80% (89 requests) were made to Silcoautomotive.in and 8% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Fonts.gstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 437.9 kB (20%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Silco.in main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 947.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 102.0 kB

  • Original 122.2 kB
  • After minification 121.2 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 102.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 7.0 kB

  • Original 947.1 kB
  • After minification 940.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Silco images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.4 kB

  • Original 497.7 kB
  • After minification 497.7 kB
  • After compression 494.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 325.5 kB

  • Original 659.9 kB
  • After minification 658.1 kB
  • After compression 334.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Silco.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 325.5 kB or 49% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 60 (62%)

Requests Now

97

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Silco. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 36 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 26 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

silco.in accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

High

ARIA toggle fields do not have accessible names

High

[aria-*] attributes do not have valid values

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

silco.in best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

silco.in SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Silco.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Silco.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Silco. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: