Access sjuup.dk. Gave Ideer? De Bedste Anmeldelser Af Gaveideer

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

28/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.2 s

43/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.8 s

67/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

90/100

10%

sjuup.dk

376 ms

www.sjuup.com

1850 ms

styles.css

342 ms

bootstrap.bundle.min.js

17 ms

analytics.js

614 ms

Our browser made a total of 19 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sjuup.dk, 74% (14 requests) were made to Sjuup.com and 5% (1 request) were made to Cdn.jsdelivr.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) relates to the external source Sjuup.com.

Content Size

717.0 kB

After Optimization

703.4 kB

In fact, the total size of Sjuup.dk main page is 717.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 671.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

Original 16.5 kB
After minification 14.0 kB
After compression 3.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.5 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 671.3 kB
After minification 671.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sjuup images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 113 B

Original 718 B
After minification 718 B
After compression 605 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 113 B or 16% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 435 B

Original 28.5 kB
After minification 28.5 kB
After compression 28.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sjuup.dk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sjuup. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.