Access skeddle.com. Qualification Management for Corporates

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

6/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value11.2 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.3 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,510 ms

14/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.8 s

8/100

10%

skeddle.com

194 ms

www.skeddle.com

1557 ms

h9eq8.css

277 ms

h9eq8.css

277 ms

h9eq8.css

739 ms

Our browser made a total of 139 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (132 requests) were addressed to the original Skeddle.com, 1% (2 requests) were made to App.usercentrics.eu and 1% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Skeddle.com.

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Skeddle.com main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Javascripts take 1.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 394.1 kB

Original 540.6 kB
After minification 532.2 kB
After compression 146.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 394.1 kB or 73% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 18.7 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Skeddle images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 979.8 kB

Original 1.7 MB
After minification 1.7 MB
After compression 769.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 979.8 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 994.4 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.1 MB
After compression 145.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Skeddle.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 994.4 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 79 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Skeddle. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 58 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.