Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    74% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 30% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

slicer.ir

وب سایت فروشگاهی انواع اسلایسر های صنعتی | کالباس بر | اسلایسر میوه | اسلایسر گوشت | اسلایسر سیب زمینی | چرخ گوشت | slicer

Page Load Speed

25.1 sec in total

First Response

596 ms

Resources Loaded

24.1 sec

Page Rendered

398 ms

About Website

Visit slicer.ir now to see the best up-to-date Slicer content for Iran and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about slicer.ir

کالباس بر و اسلایسر صنعتی جهت اسلایس انواع مواد غذایی به کار می رود ، دستگاه اسلایسر و چرخ گوشت بهترین روش جهت اسلایس است که در هنگام برش ، مواد غذایی را خرد و ظاهر آنها را از بین نمی برد ، خرید کالبا...

Visit slicer.ir

Key Findings

We analyzed Slicer.ir page load time and found that the first response time was 596 ms and then it took 24.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.

Performance Metrics

slicer.ir performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

64/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.6 s

8/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.7 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.2 s

85/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

slicer.ir

596 ms

slicer.ir

2287 ms

UserSheetFa.css

1334 ms

ResponsiveStyleSheet.css

882 ms

jquery-1.7.2.min.js

1445 ms

Our browser made a total of 112 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 96% of them (108 requests) were addressed to the original Slicer.ir, 1% (1 request) were made to Trustseal.enamad.ir and 1% (1 request) were made to Logo.samandehi.ir. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.1 sec) relates to the external source Trustseal.enamad.ir.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 642.9 kB (40%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

959.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Slicer.ir main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 107.8 kB

  • Original 122.1 kB
  • After minification 100.3 kB
  • After compression 14.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 21.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 107.8 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 187.6 kB

  • Original 1.1 MB
  • After minification 862.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Slicer needs image optimization as it can save up to 187.6 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 215.4 kB

  • Original 277.9 kB
  • After minification 259.5 kB
  • After compression 62.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 215.4 kB or 78% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 132.1 kB

  • Original 151.6 kB
  • After minification 110.4 kB
  • After compression 19.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Slicer.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.1 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (16%)

Requests Now

100

After Optimization

84

The browser has sent 100 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Slicer. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

slicer.ir accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

slicer.ir best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

slicer.ir SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    FA

  • Language Claimed

    FA

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Slicer.ir can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Persian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Slicer.ir main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Slicer. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: