Access smallhouseholdappliancereviews.com. 赛博体育

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

71/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

66/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.4 s

89/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value210 ms

88/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.8 s

67/100

10%

smallhouseholdappliancereviews.com

2882 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

154 ms

tfg_style.css

111 ms

style.css

172 ms

screen.min.css

95 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 31% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Smallhouseholdappliancereviews.com, 11% (10 requests) were made to Ecx.images-amazon.com and 9% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Smallhouseholdappliancereviews.com.

Content Size

1.3 MB

After Optimization

462.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Smallhouseholdappliancereviews.com main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 455.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 173.7 kB

Original 210.8 kB
After minification 198.9 kB
After compression 37.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 173.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 14.7 kB

Original 209.3 kB
After minification 194.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Smallhouseholdappliancereviews images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 292.7 kB

Original 455.5 kB
After minification 435.3 kB
After compression 162.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 292.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 321.9 kB

Original 389.9 kB
After minification 382.2 kB
After compression 68.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smallhouseholdappliancereviews.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 321.9 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smallhouseholdappliancereviews. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 37 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.