Access smilegallery.com. General & Cosmetic Dentistry in Cupertino, CA

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.6 s

34/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.9 s

4/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,020 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.127

82/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.3 s

4/100

10%

smilegallery.com

152 ms

smilegallery.com

365 ms

yrw-widget.css

69 ms

style.min.css

139 ms

styles.css

211 ms

Our browser made a total of 182 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 88% of them (161 requests) were addressed to the original Smilegallery.com, 4% (8 requests) were made to Lh3.googleusercontent.com and 3% (5 requests) were made to Cdn.trustindex.io. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (820 ms) belongs to the original domain Smilegallery.com.

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

2.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Smilegallery.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 134.1 kB

Original 165.2 kB
After minification 162.1 kB
After compression 31.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 134.1 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-24%

Potential reduce by 334.9 kB

Original 1.4 MB
After minification 1.1 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Smilegallery needs image optimization as it can save up to 334.9 kB or 24% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 147.4 kB

Original 1.0 MB
After minification 1.0 MB
After compression 856.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 147.4 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-9%

Potential reduce by 24.8 kB

Original 270.5 kB
After minification 269.3 kB
After compression 245.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Smilegallery.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

178

After Optimization

The browser has sent 178 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Smilegallery. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 109 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 30 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.