Access snapp.ir. سوپر اپلیکیشن اسنپ | سامانه هوشمند حمل‌ونقل

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.4 s

70/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

73/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.3 s

41/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value5,020 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.4 s

30/100

10%

snapp.ir

636 ms

analytics.js

63 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

201 ms

styles.css

69 ms

styles-rtl.css

287 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (59 requests) were addressed to the original Snapp.ir, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.4 sec) relates to the external source Amirajorloo.com.

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.2 MB

In fact, the total size of Snapp.ir main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 77.3 kB

Original 94.5 kB
After minification 91.5 kB
After compression 17.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.3 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 41.1 kB

Original 1.1 MB
After minification 1.0 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snapp images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 32.0 kB

Original 53.1 kB
After minification 53.1 kB
After compression 21.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 32.0 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-89%

Potential reduce by 871.8 kB

Original 974.4 kB
After minification 805.9 kB
After compression 102.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snapp.ir needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 871.8 kB or 89% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 63 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snapp. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.