Report Summary

  • 31

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    51% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

snipclip.com

As a digital agency, we implement your digital strategy

Page Load Speed

34.2 sec in total

First Response

5.5 sec

Resources Loaded

27 sec

Page Rendered

1.7 sec

About Website

Welcome to snipclip.com homepage info - get ready to check Snipclip best content for Germany right away, or after learning these important things about snipclip.com

As a digital agency with more than 500 projects behind us, we develop, improve and implement digital strategies.

Visit snipclip.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Snipclip.com page load time and found that the first response time was 5.5 sec and then it took 28.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 95% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

snipclip.com performance score

31

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

27/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.8 s

55/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value21.6 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value16,610 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.4 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

snipclip.com

5528 ms

application.css

2206 ms

64c57be.png

321 ms

news-umsetzbar.png

619 ms

apple-watch-app-turbowatch.png

1114 ms

Our browser made a total of 161 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 62% of them (100 requests) were addressed to the original Snipclip.com, 28% (45 requests) were made to Maps.googleapis.com and 6% (9 requests) were made to Maps.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (12.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Snipclip.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 762.5 kB (12%)

Content Size

6.4 MB

After Optimization

5.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Snipclip.com main page is 6.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 5.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 198.0 kB

  • Original 220.0 kB
  • After minification 143.7 kB
  • After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 76.3 kB, which is 35% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 198.0 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 198.1 kB

  • Original 5.7 MB
  • After minification 5.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Snipclip images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 218.3 kB

  • Original 320.3 kB
  • After minification 320.3 kB
  • After compression 102.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 218.3 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 148.1 kB

  • Original 172.5 kB
  • After minification 150.1 kB
  • After compression 24.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Snipclip.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 148.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (10%)

Requests Now

153

After Optimization

138

The browser has sent 153 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Snipclip. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

snipclip.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

snipclip.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

snipclip.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    DE

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Snipclip.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed German language. Our system also found out that Snipclip.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Snipclip. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: