Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 38

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    57% of other websites

  • 98

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 94% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 97

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    91% of websites

sonoque.com

Sonoque | Portable ultrasound

Page Load Speed

1.8 sec in total

First Response

86 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

87 ms

About Website

Visit sonoque.com now to see the best up-to-date Sonoque content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about sonoque.com

Introducing the future of medical imaging technology with the SonoQue premium handheld ultrasound, an innovative portable imaging device that can meet your needs without expensive subscriptions. The i...

Visit sonoque.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sonoque.com page load time and found that the first response time was 86 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sonoque.com performance score

38

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

67/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

58/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.0 s

9/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,050 ms

1/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value23.1 s

1/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.sonoque.com

86 ms

originTrials.41d7301a.bundle.min.js

49 ms

minified.js

49 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

48 ms

polyfill.min.js

464 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Sonoque.com, 47% (29 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 27% (17 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (984 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 722.5 kB (39%)

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Sonoque.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 879.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 716.5 kB

  • Original 879.2 kB
  • After minification 877.5 kB
  • After compression 162.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 716.5 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 3.2 kB

  • Original 743.9 kB
  • After minification 740.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sonoque images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 2.8 kB

  • Original 228.9 kB
  • After minification 228.8 kB
  • After compression 226.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 11 (19%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

46

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sonoque. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

sonoque.com accessibility score

98

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

sonoque.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

sonoque.com SEO score

97

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sonoque.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Sonoque.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sonoque. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: