Report Summary

  • 3

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    20% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    74% of websites

southamptonfc.com

Home | Southampton FC Official Site

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

194 ms

Resources Loaded

2.5 sec

Page Rendered

648 ms

About Website

Welcome to southamptonfc.com homepage info - get ready to check Southampton FC best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about southamptonfc.com

Welcome to the new website of Southampton Football Club.

Visit southamptonfc.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Southamptonfc.com page load time and found that the first response time was 194 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

southamptonfc.com performance score

3

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.1 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value25.0 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.4 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value2,040 ms

7/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.067

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value26.5 s

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

southamptonfc.com

194 ms

southamptonfc.com

658 ms

VisitorIdentification.js

113 ms

app.css

338 ms

878 ms

Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (33 requests) were addressed to the original Southamptonfc.com, 9% (5 requests) were made to Player.ooyala.com and 6% (3 requests) were made to Connect.facebook.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (980 ms) relates to the external source S4-sfc.thirdlight.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.8 MB (64%)

Content Size

2.9 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Southamptonfc.com main page is 2.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 164.4 kB

  • Original 200.9 kB
  • After minification 183.4 kB
  • After compression 36.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 164.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 1.5 kB

  • Original 371.0 kB
  • After minification 369.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Southampton FC images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 1.3 MB

  • Original 1.8 MB
  • After minification 1.8 MB
  • After compression 557.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.3 MB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 405.9 kB

  • Original 471.8 kB
  • After minification 468.7 kB
  • After compression 65.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Southamptonfc.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 405.9 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (30%)

Requests Now

46

After Optimization

32

The browser has sent 46 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Southampton FC. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

southamptonfc.com accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

southamptonfc.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

southamptonfc.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Southamptonfc.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Southamptonfc.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Southampton FC. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: