Access spiders-design.co.uk. Wordpress Services Norfolk | Wordpress Maintenance Service Norfolk

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

11/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value12.3 s

3/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value9,730 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.024

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value17.0 s

4/100

10%

spiders-design.co.uk

379 ms

wordpress-services

507 ms

javascript;base64,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

90 ms

webfontloader.min.js

91 ms

b962760315e1563c730884b22af83ff4.css

158 ms

Our browser made a total of 103 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Spiders-design.co.uk, 52% (54 requests) were made to Rivmedia.co.uk and 36% (37 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) relates to the external source Rivmedia.co.uk.

Content Size

447.5 kB

After Optimization

297.0 kB

In fact, the total size of Spiders-design.co.uk main page is 447.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 183.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 148.8 kB

Original 183.3 kB
After minification 176.7 kB
After compression 34.5 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 148.8 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 388 B

Original 95.4 kB
After minification 95.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Spiders Design images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 589 B

Original 75.6 kB
After minification 75.6 kB
After compression 75.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 749 B

Original 93.2 kB
After minification 93.2 kB
After compression 92.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Spiders-design.co.uk has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Spiders Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.