Access staciecarr.com. Stacie Carr

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value10.7 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value11.5 s

5/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value490 ms

59/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value1.011

2/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value14.7 s

8/100

10%

www.staciecarr.com

61 ms

jGdggnur_hw7aBgYCfJ2nGSpLhnMeCUX4rD6-c9t4f6feG92fFHN4UJLFRbh52jhWD9aFcmRjcJowRM35Q885QSaZ2gRwcFRZg7-MPG0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUCdhFydeyzSabCSasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUDieBR-AmRjW4kOcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88OWiydel8SKuap2mDO1FUiABkZWF3jAF8OcFzdPUaiaS0Sasyjh88jhBkSKoRdhXK2hZkZA81-Ybljc81OWgkdkJJjW40dku3ScvKfAZuiYmkjPu3ifGHfOHbMsMMeMb6MKGHfO-bMsMMeM96MKGHfOKbMsMMeMj6MKGHfOfbMsMMeMS6MKGHfO5bMsMMeMt6MKGHfOpbMsMMeMv6MKGHfOebMsMMegI6MKG4fHufIMIjgfMfH6qJyB9bMy6IJMJ7fbRxmgMfeM96MKG4fJBmIMJjgkMfH6qJym9bMy65JMJ7fbKfmsMfegI6MTMgzExXX69.js

34 ms

legacy.js

6 ms

modern.js

9 ms

extract-css-runtime-d7a5c3a8f67d92b3f2dd-min.en-US.js

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Staciecarr.com, 41% (14 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 35% (12 requests) were made to Assets.squarespace.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (206 ms) belongs to the original domain Staciecarr.com.

Content Size

1.9 MB

After Optimization

1.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Staciecarr.com main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 109.6 kB

Original 131.6 kB
After minification 113.1 kB
After compression 22.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.5 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 109.6 kB or 83% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 25.9 kB

Original 433.5 kB
After minification 407.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stacie Carr images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 5.5 kB

Original 1.3 MB
After minification 1.3 MB
After compression 1.3 MB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 122 B

Original 7.0 kB
After minification 7.0 kB
After compression 6.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Staciecarr.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 20 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stacie Carr. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.