Access starj.com. HILLSBORO Star-Journal | Newspaper from Hillsboro KS

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

68/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value11.2 s

20/100

10%

starj.com

317 ms

style.css

106 ms

hsj.css

56 ms

script.js

56 ms

quant.js

5 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Starj.com, 6% (2 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (317 ms) belongs to the original domain Starj.com.

Content Size

2.4 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Starj.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 21.1 kB

Original 29.3 kB
After minification 28.4 kB
After compression 8.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.1 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 52.5 kB

Original 1.5 MB
After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Star J images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 531.7 kB

Original 827.7 kB
After minification 821.9 kB
After compression 296.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 531.7 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 43.2 kB

Original 49.9 kB
After minification 34.2 kB
After compression 6.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Starj.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 43.2 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Star J. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.