Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 94

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 83% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 90

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    68% of websites

steripax.com

Steripax - Flexible & Sterilizable Packaging For The Medical Device, Diagnostic, Pharmaceutical And Cannabis Industries.

Page Load Speed

4.2 sec in total

First Response

181 ms

Resources Loaded

3.4 sec

Page Rendered

627 ms

About Website

Welcome to steripax.com homepage info - get ready to check Steripax best content right away, or after learning these important things about steripax.com

SteriPax was founded in 1994 on the west coast to fill a need for a service-oriented medical packaging company. Our commitment was and still is, to provide the highest quality products faster and more...

Visit steripax.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Steripax.com page load time and found that the first response time was 181 ms and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

steripax.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value7.1 s

1/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.8 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value10.4 s

8/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value170 ms

93/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.058

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.7 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

steripax.com

181 ms

www.steripax.com

654 ms

pageloader.css

199 ms

wpautoterms.css

204 ms

style.min.css

205 ms

Our browser made a total of 104 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 73% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Steripax.com, 26% (27 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (740 ms) belongs to the original domain Steripax.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 326.4 kB (20%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Steripax.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 786.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-39%

Potential reduce by 307.3 kB

  • Original 786.4 kB
  • After minification 779.3 kB
  • After compression 479.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 307.3 kB or 39% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 410.7 kB
  • After minification 410.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Steripax images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-10%

Potential reduce by 17.4 kB

  • Original 181.9 kB
  • After minification 181.9 kB
  • After compression 164.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 222.6 kB
  • After minification 222.2 kB
  • After compression 220.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Steripax.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (75%)

Requests Now

71

After Optimization

18

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Steripax. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 36 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

steripax.com accessibility score

94

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

High

Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

steripax.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

steripax.com SEO score

90

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Steripax.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Steripax.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Steripax. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: