Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 55

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    20% of websites

stilte.com

Page Load Speed

2.2 sec in total

First Response

271 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

138 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stilte content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stilte.com

Visit stilte.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stilte.com page load time and found that the first response time was 271 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stilte.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.9 s

52/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.2 s

92/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value10 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.3 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stilte.com

271 ms

placeholder.hostnet.nl

582 ms

jquery.min.js

18 ms

general.css

256 ms

base.css

257 ms

Our browser made a total of 13 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 8% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stilte.com, 46% (6 requests) were made to Placeholder.hostnet.nl and 31% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (681 ms) relates to the external source Placeholder.hostnet.nl.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 7.4 kB (1%)

Content Size

507.3 kB

After Optimization

499.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stilte.com main page is 507.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 463.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-19%

Potential reduce by 27 B

  • Original 142 B
  • After minification 142 B
  • After compression 115 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27 B or 19% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 463.7 kB
  • After minification 463.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stilte images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 17 B

  • Original 33.6 kB
  • After minification 33.6 kB
  • After compression 33.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-75%

Potential reduce by 7.3 kB

  • Original 9.8 kB
  • After minification 6.9 kB
  • After compression 2.5 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stilte.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 7.3 kB or 75% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (38%)

Requests Now

8

After Optimization

5

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 8 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stilte. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Best Practices

stilte.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

stilte.com SEO score

55

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stilte.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Stilte.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stilte. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: