Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 25

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    44% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 61% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

stitchxmarker.com

Event Styling Singapore | Stitch X Marker Styling Studio

Page Load Speed

2 sec in total

First Response

362 ms

Resources Loaded

1.6 sec

Page Rendered

82 ms

About Website

Welcome to stitchxmarker.com homepage info - get ready to check Stitch X Marker best content right away, or after learning these important things about stitchxmarker.com

Customised event styling in Singapore for weddings, birthday parties, corporate events, and product photoshoot styling. Click to find out more.

Visit stitchxmarker.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stitchxmarker.com page load time and found that the first response time was 362 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 35% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stitchxmarker.com performance score

25

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

45/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.9 s

48/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value3,230 ms

2/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value18.4 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.stitchxmarker.com

362 ms

minified.js

40 ms

focus-within-polyfill.js

39 ms

polyfill.min.js

38 ms

thunderbolt-commons.b70ee867.bundle.min.js

105 ms

Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Stitchxmarker.com, 34% (19 requests) were made to Static.wixstatic.com and 21% (12 requests) were made to Static.parastorage.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (796 ms) relates to the external source Static.wixstatic.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 744.7 kB (52%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

675.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stitchxmarker.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. HTML takes 653.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 510.5 kB

  • Original 653.8 kB
  • After minification 651.8 kB
  • After compression 143.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 510.5 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-13%

Potential reduce by 7.4 kB

  • Original 56.9 kB
  • After minification 49.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Stitch X Marker needs image optimization as it can save up to 7.4 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 226.9 kB

  • Original 648.5 kB
  • After minification 648.4 kB
  • After compression 421.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 226.9 kB or 35% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 60.7 kB
  • After minification 60.7 kB
  • After compression 60.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stitchxmarker.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (35%)

Requests Now

43

After Optimization

28

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 43 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stitch X Marker. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

stitchxmarker.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

stitchxmarker.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

stitchxmarker.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stitchxmarker.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stitchxmarker.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Stitch X Marker. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: