Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 33

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    53% of other websites

  • 81

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 51% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 71

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    30% of websites

stobag.com

Awnings, Canopies and Sun Shading | STOBAG

Page Load Speed

3.2 sec in total

First Response

49 ms

Resources Loaded

1.8 sec

Page Rendered

1.4 sec

About Website

Visit stobag.com now to see the best up-to-date STOBAG content for Switzerland and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about stobag.com

Privacy screens for your balcony, awnings for window fronts or shade for your terrace. With us you will find the best products for every outdoor living area.

Visit stobag.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Stobag.com page load time and found that the first response time was 49 ms and then it took 3.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stobag.com performance score

33

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

44/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value7.5 s

26/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,620 ms

12/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.319

36/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.2 s

16/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stobag.com

49 ms

126 ms

OtAutoBlock.js

41 ms

otSDKStub.js

55 ms

script.js

43 ms

Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 38% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Stobag.com, 47% (28 requests) were made to Media.stobag.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Media.graphassets.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Stobag.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 143.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

959.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Stobag.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 479.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 142.2 kB

  • Original 158.4 kB
  • After minification 155.8 kB
  • After compression 16.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 479.5 kB
  • After minification 479.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STOBAG images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 584 B

  • Original 407.6 kB
  • After minification 407.6 kB
  • After compression 407.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 757 B

  • Original 57.3 kB
  • After minification 57.3 kB
  • After compression 56.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Stobag.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 21 (38%)

Requests Now

56

After Optimization

35

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 56 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STOBAG. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

stobag.com accessibility score

81

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

stobag.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

stobag.com SEO score

71

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stobag.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Stobag.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of STOBAG. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: