Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 96

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    94% of other websites

  • 61

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 27% of websites

  • 50

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    19% of websites

  • 69

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    28% of websites

stonewriter.net

Unique and monumental stonework from natural and mountain stone.

Page Load Speed

1 sec in total

First Response

206 ms

Resources Loaded

700 ms

Page Rendered

139 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Stone Writer content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about stonewriter.net

Natural field and mountain stone cut, polished and engraved for unique and one of a kind headstones, grave and cemetery markers, monument and farm signs.

Visit stonewriter.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Stonewriter.net page load time and found that the first response time was 206 ms and then it took 839 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

stonewriter.net performance score

96

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

92/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

88/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.061

97/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

stonewriter.net

206 ms

Stonewriter.net.css

68 ms

jquery.js

89 ms

shop20061842.jpg

88 ms

counter3.pl

295 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (14 requests) were addressed to the original Stonewriter.net, 22% (4 requests) were made to Siterightnow.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) relates to the external source Siterightnow.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 14.1 kB (11%)

Content Size

134.1 kB

After Optimization

120.0 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Stonewriter.net main page is 134.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 85.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 12.6 kB

  • Original 15.5 kB
  • After minification 15.2 kB
  • After compression 2.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.6 kB or 81% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

  • Original 85.7 kB
  • After minification 84.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Stone Writer images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 32.9 kB
  • After minification 32.9 kB
  • After compression 32.9 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Stone Writer. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

stonewriter.net accessibility score

61

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

stonewriter.net best practices score

50

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

stonewriter.net SEO score

69

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Stonewriter.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Stonewriter.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Stone Writer. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: