Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 100

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    97% of other websites

  • 71

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 36% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 58

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    21% of websites

storlise.com

Storlise

Page Load Speed

8.1 sec in total

First Response

279 ms

Resources Loaded

4.7 sec

Page Rendered

3.2 sec

About Website

Welcome to storlise.com homepage info - get ready to check Storlise best content right away, or after learning these important things about storlise.com

Create your online store & start selling online.

Visit storlise.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Storlise.com page load time and found that the first response time was 279 ms and then it took 7.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

storlise.com performance score

100

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0.7 s

100/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0.8 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

storlise.com

279 ms

www.storlise.com

1478 ms

fontawesome-all.min.css

96 ms

fontawesome-iconpicker.min.css

189 ms

css

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Storlise.com, 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2 sec) belongs to the original domain Storlise.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 640.4 kB (17%)

Content Size

3.7 MB

After Optimization

3.1 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Storlise.com main page is 3.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 69.1 kB

  • Original 80.4 kB
  • After minification 70.2 kB
  • After compression 11.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 10.2 kB, which is 13% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 69.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6.5 kB

  • Original 2.9 MB
  • After minification 2.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storlise images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 16.0 kB

  • Original 73.7 kB
  • After minification 70.4 kB
  • After compression 57.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 16.0 kB or 22% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 548.7 kB

  • Original 643.6 kB
  • After minification 593.4 kB
  • After compression 95.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storlise.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 548.7 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 20 (34%)

Requests Now

58

After Optimization

38

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storlise. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

storlise.com accessibility score

71

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

storlise.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

storlise.com SEO score

58

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storlise.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Storlise.com main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Storlise. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: