Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 47

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    65% of other websites

  • 51

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 21% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    35% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

storybird.com

Storybird - Artful Storytelling

Page Load Speed

600 ms in total

First Response

26 ms

Resources Loaded

450 ms

Page Rendered

124 ms

About Website

Welcome to storybird.com homepage info - get ready to check Storybird best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about storybird.com

Become a better writer with Storybird’s creativity tools. Online courses, challenges, and reader feedback will help you improve your writing.

Visit storybird.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Storybird.com page load time and found that the first response time was 26 ms and then it took 574 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

storybird.com performance score

47

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.8 s

89/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value21.5 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.4 s

18/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value410 ms

67/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value13.9 s

10/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

storybird.com

26 ms

vue.js

82 ms

index.css

96 ms

js

191 ms

shared~app.44727765.css

40 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (7 requests) were addressed to the original Storybird.com, 48% (11 requests) were made to Unpkg.com and 4% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (191 ms) relates to the external source Googletagmanager.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 23.0 kB (9%)

Content Size

257.6 kB

After Optimization

234.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Storybird.com main page is 257.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 124.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 22.9 kB

  • Original 35.2 kB
  • After minification 35.2 kB
  • After compression 12.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 22.9 kB or 65% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 2.1 kB
  • After minification 2.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Storybird images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 26 B

  • Original 124.2 kB
  • After minification 124.2 kB
  • After compression 124.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 96.1 kB
  • After minification 96.1 kB
  • After compression 96.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Storybird.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (76%)

Requests Now

21

After Optimization

5

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 21 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Storybird. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 17 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

storybird.com accessibility score

51

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

storybird.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

storybird.com SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

High

robots.txt is not valid

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Storybird.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Storybird.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Storybird. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: