Report Summary

  • 44

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    63% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

strong.digital

The Brisbane Web Design team you've been looking for

Page Load Speed

4.6 sec in total

First Response

54 ms

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

891 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Strong content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about strong.digital

Hey, you found us! Do you need a Brisbane Web Design team that cares as much as you? Sick of the BS, Pushy Sales & Empty Promises? Us too!

Visit strong.digital

Key Findings

We analyzed Strong.digital page load time and found that the first response time was 54 ms and then it took 4.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

strong.digital performance score

44

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

58/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.0 s

2/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.4 s

75/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value810 ms

36/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.9 s

44/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

strong.digital

54 ms

strong.digital

56 ms

style.min.css

25 ms

st-trigger-button.css

66 ms

public-main.css

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (61 requests) were addressed to the original Strong.digital, 8% (6 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdnjs.cloudflare.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Strong.digital.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 158.0 kB (4%)

Content Size

3.8 MB

After Optimization

3.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Strong.digital main page is 3.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 3.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 120.4 kB

  • Original 143.0 kB
  • After minification 133.3 kB
  • After compression 22.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 120.4 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 37.6 kB

  • Original 3.6 MB
  • After minification 3.6 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Strong images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 8 B

  • Original 3.8 kB
  • After minification 3.8 kB
  • After compression 3.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 5 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (54%)

Requests Now

68

After Optimization

31

The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Strong. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

strong.digital accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

strong.digital best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

strong.digital SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Strong.digital can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Strong.digital main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Strong. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: