Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 96

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 88% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 99

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    93% of websites

studiojq.co

TechPocket - Technology News and Tech Tips Everyday!

Page Load Speed

2.1 sec in total

First Response

70 ms

Resources Loaded

1.5 sec

Page Rendered

550 ms

About Website

Welcome to studiojq.co homepage info - get ready to check Studiojq best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about studiojq.co

TechPocket is a Best Source of Technology News, Computer & Business News, How to, Tips and Tricks, Gadgets, Phones & more.

Visit studiojq.co

Key Findings

We analyzed Studiojq.co page load time and found that the first response time was 70 ms and then it took 2.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studiojq.co performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.6 s

63/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.7 s

59/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.6 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value40 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.7 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.techpocket.org

70 ms

www.techpocket.net

477 ms

techpocket1-1.png

86 ms

roblox.jpg

46 ms

Download-Pinterest-Videos-740x414.jpeg

69 ms

Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Studiojq.co, 3% (1 request) were made to Techpocket.org. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (708 ms) relates to the external source Techpocket.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 126.6 kB (16%)

Content Size

776.1 kB

After Optimization

649.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images

In fact, the total size of Studiojq.co main page is 776.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 623.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 112.6 kB

  • Original 152.4 kB
  • After minification 148.0 kB
  • After compression 39.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 112.6 kB or 74% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 14.0 kB

  • Original 623.6 kB
  • After minification 609.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Studiojq images are well optimized though.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

29

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Studiojq. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

studiojq.co accessibility score

96

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

studiojq.co best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

studiojq.co SEO score

99

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studiojq.co can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studiojq.co main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Studiojq. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: