Report Summary

  • 49

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    67% of other websites

  • 91

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 76% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

studios.com

STUDIOS Architecture | International Architecture and Design Firm

Page Load Speed

685 ms in total

First Response

57 ms

Resources Loaded

436 ms

Page Rendered

192 ms

About Website

Visit studios.com now to see the best up-to-date STUDIOS content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about studios.com

We are an international design practice that believes in the transformative power of design to lift the trajectories of individual lives and entire communities.

Visit studios.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Studios.com page load time and found that the first response time was 57 ms and then it took 628 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

studios.com performance score

49

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

57/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.6 s

18/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value620 ms

48/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.3 s

49/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

studios.com

57 ms

studios.com

79 ms

main.css

3 ms

custom.css

17 ms

js

87 ms

Our browser made a total of 20 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 30% of them (6 requests) were addressed to the original Studios.com, 25% (5 requests) were made to Use.typekit.net and 20% (4 requests) were made to Studios.imgix.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (259 ms) relates to the external source Cdn.polyfill.io.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 33.2 kB (11%)

Content Size

290.8 kB

After Optimization

257.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Studios.com main page is 290.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 130.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-78%

Potential reduce by 32.1 kB

  • Original 41.1 kB
  • After minification 37.5 kB
  • After compression 9.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 32.1 kB or 78% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 130.5 kB
  • After minification 130.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. STUDIOS images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 402 B

  • Original 108.9 kB
  • After minification 108.9 kB
  • After compression 108.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 683 B

  • Original 10.2 kB
  • After minification 10.2 kB
  • After compression 9.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Studios.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 7 (50%)

Requests Now

14

After Optimization

7

The browser has sent 14 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of STUDIOS. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

studios.com accessibility score

91

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

studios.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

studios.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Studios.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Studios.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of STUDIOS. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: