Access successive.tech. Digital Transformation Services & Solutions

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

28/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.5 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,690 ms

11/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value22.0 s

1/100

10%

successive.tech

34 ms

successive.tech

2174 ms

3074bd279e7d86d5c80a4c7ce05933a8.css

40 ms

jquery.js

39 ms

v2.js

68 ms

Our browser made a total of 82 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (75 requests) were addressed to the original Successive.tech, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Js.hsforms.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.4 sec) belongs to the original domain Successive.tech.

Content Size

4.6 MB

After Optimization

3.7 MB

In fact, the total size of Successive.tech main page is 4.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 75% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 4.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 119.9 kB

Original 151.6 kB
After minification 132.9 kB
After compression 31.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 18.7 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 119.9 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 739.2 kB

Original 4.2 MB
After minification 3.4 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Successive needs image optimization as it can save up to 739.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.6 kB

Original 138.2 kB
After minification 138.2 kB
After compression 136.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 98.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 73 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Successive. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.