Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    80% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

sugarhillmanor.com

De Muziek Blog

Page Load Speed

1.3 sec in total

First Response

164 ms

Resources Loaded

943 ms

Page Rendered

212 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Sugarhillmanor content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about sugarhillmanor.com

Blijf op de hoogte van het laatste muzieknieuws en ontdek nieuwe artiesten met diepgaande analyses en recensies.

Visit sugarhillmanor.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Sugarhillmanor.com page load time and found that the first response time was 164 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

sugarhillmanor.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.5 s

66/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

65/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

97/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.162

72/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

sugarhillmanor.com

164 ms

www.sugarhillmanor.com

251 ms

css

37 ms

style.css

228 ms

race-otgilb.png

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 16 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 81% of them (13 requests) were addressed to the original Sugarhillmanor.com, 13% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 6% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (532 ms) belongs to the original domain Sugarhillmanor.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 17.1 kB (10%)

Content Size

178.0 kB

After Optimization

160.9 kB

In fact, the total size of Sugarhillmanor.com main page is 178.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 157.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 12.1 kB

  • Original 15.3 kB
  • After minification 14.8 kB
  • After compression 3.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 12.1 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 3.7 kB

  • Original 157.4 kB
  • After minification 153.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Sugarhillmanor images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-14%

Potential reduce by 45 B

  • Original 331 B
  • After minification 331 B
  • After compression 286 B

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 45 B or 14% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-26%

Potential reduce by 1.3 kB

  • Original 5.0 kB
  • After minification 5.0 kB
  • After compression 3.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Sugarhillmanor.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.3 kB or 26% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Sugarhillmanor. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Accessibility Review

sugarhillmanor.com accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

sugarhillmanor.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

sugarhillmanor.com SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    NL

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Sugarhillmanor.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is Dutch. Our system also found out that Sugarhillmanor.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Sugarhillmanor. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: