Access surex.com. Compare & Save on Canada's Best Insurance Rates

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

60/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.8 s

84/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,360 ms

17/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.1 s

42/100

10%

surex.com

51 ms

surex.com

70 ms

www.surex.com

70 ms

home

23 ms

j.php

53 ms

Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 57% of them (30 requests) were addressed to the original Surex.com, 17% (9 requests) were made to Dev.visualwebsiteoptimizer.com and 13% (7 requests) were made to Cdn-brochure.surex.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (215 ms) relates to the external source Cdn-brochure.surex.com.

Content Size

244.8 kB

After Optimization

195.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Surex.com main page is 244.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 171.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 48.4 kB

Original 59.1 kB
After minification 48.0 kB
After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 11.1 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

Original 857 B
After minification 857 B

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Surex images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 636 B

Original 171.4 kB
After minification 171.4 kB
After compression 170.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 230 B

Original 13.5 kB
After minification 13.5 kB
After compression 13.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Surex.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Surex. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.