Access surplusrack.com. Leading Material Handling Dealer

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.5 s

19/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.9 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.104

89/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.9 s

78/100

10%

surplusrack.com

131 ms

mobile.js

52 ms

Surplus.css

62 ms

plusone.js

27 ms

surplus.js

74 ms

Our browser made a total of 61 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (50 requests) were addressed to the original Surplusrack.com, 10% (6 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 2% (1 request) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (394 ms) relates to the external source Developers.google.com.

Content Size

358.8 kB

After Optimization

326.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Surplusrack.com main page is 358.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 165.0 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 21.7 kB

Original 27.4 kB
After minification 21.6 kB
After compression 5.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.7 kB, which is 21% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 21.7 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 220 B

Original 163.7 kB
After minification 163.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Surplus Rack images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 9.5 kB

Original 165.0 kB
After minification 164.9 kB
After compression 155.5 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 891 B

Original 2.8 kB
After minification 2.8 kB
After compression 1.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Surplusrack.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 891 B or 32% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 58 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Surplus Rack. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.