Access swift-equipment.com. Industrial Equipment for Sale

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value5.7 s

5/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.9 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.2 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value7,180 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.107

88/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value24.7 s

0/100

10%

swift-equipment.com

42 ms

swiftequipment.com

1159 ms

inlinks.js

105 ms

js

105 ms

gtm.js

146 ms

Our browser made a total of 168 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Swift-equipment.com, 89% (150 requests) were made to Swiftequipment.com and 2% (4 requests) were made to Googletagmanager.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) relates to the external source Swiftequipment.com.

Content Size

9.0 MB

After Optimization

5.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Swift-equipment.com main page is 9.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 7.7 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 150.6 kB

Original 177.8 kB
After minification 173.3 kB
After compression 27.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 150.6 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-37%

Potential reduce by 2.9 MB

Original 7.7 MB
After minification 4.9 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Swift Equipment needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 MB or 37% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-11%

Potential reduce by 87.7 kB

Original 775.0 kB
After minification 775.0 kB
After compression 687.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 11% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-35%

Potential reduce by 90.9 kB

Original 261.5 kB
After minification 258.5 kB
After compression 170.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Swift-equipment.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 90.9 kB or 35% of the original size.

Requests Now

159

After Optimization

The browser has sent 159 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Swift Equipment. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 122 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.