Access www2.slimpay.com. Maximize recurring payments collection

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

46/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value6.5 s

9/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.8 s

83/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value70 ms

99/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.001

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.1 s

75/100

10%

www.slimpay.com

518 ms

style.css

102 ms

search-page.css

199 ms

style-index.css

298 ms

style.min.css

290 ms

Our browser made a total of 63 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Www2.slimpay.com, 5% (3 requests) were made to Explore.trustly.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (736 ms) relates to the external source Slimpay.com.

Content Size

502.1 kB

After Optimization

370.6 kB

In fact, the total size of Www2.slimpay.com main page is 502.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 330.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 128.4 kB

Original 157.4 kB
After minification 155.4 kB
After compression 29.0 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 128.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 917 B

Original 5.8 kB
After minification 4.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Www 2 Slim Pay needs image optimization as it can save up to 917 B or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

Original 330.5 kB
After minification 330.5 kB
After compression 328.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-7%

Potential reduce by 591 B

Original 8.4 kB
After minification 8.4 kB
After compression 7.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Www2.slimpay.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Www 2 Slim Pay. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 8 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.