Report Summary

  • 51

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    69% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 58

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    20% of websites

  • 64

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    24% of websites

tableconversation.com

TableConversation.com

Page Load Speed

9.6 sec in total

First Response

213 ms

Resources Loaded

7 sec

Page Rendered

2.4 sec

About Website

Click here to check amazing Table Conversation content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tableconversation.com

Ethnic food, travel and wine, with home-tested recipes.

Visit tableconversation.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Tableconversation.com page load time and found that the first response time was 213 ms and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tableconversation.com performance score

51

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.7 s

13/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value9.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.283

43/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value4.7 s

80/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tableconversation.com

213 ms

www.tableconversation.com

735 ms

styles.css

244 ms

flyouts-min.js

21 ms

hotlinks.js

507 ms

Our browser made a total of 62 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (3 requests) were addressed to the original Tableconversation.com, 61% (38 requests) were made to Smokefree.typepad.com and 13% (8 requests) were made to Static.typepad.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.3 sec) relates to the external source Smokefree.typepad.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 6.1 MB (32%)

Content Size

19.0 MB

After Optimization

12.9 MB

In fact, the total size of Tableconversation.com main page is 19.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 18.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 61.3 kB

  • Original 76.6 kB
  • After minification 71.3 kB
  • After compression 15.4 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.3 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-31%

Potential reduce by 5.8 MB

  • Original 18.6 MB
  • After minification 12.8 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Table Conversation needs image optimization as it can save up to 5.8 MB or 31% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-65%

Potential reduce by 205.4 kB

  • Original 314.4 kB
  • After minification 314.1 kB
  • After compression 109.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 205.4 kB or 65% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 47.5 kB

  • Original 57.6 kB
  • After minification 42.2 kB
  • After compression 10.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tableconversation.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 47.5 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (25%)

Requests Now

60

After Optimization

45

The browser has sent 60 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Table Conversation. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 10 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tableconversation.com accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

tableconversation.com best practices score

58

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

tableconversation.com SEO score

64

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tableconversation.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Tableconversation.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Table Conversation. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: