Tools & Wizards About Us

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    86% of other websites

  • 97

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 91% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    55% of websites

  • 100

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    94% of websites

tampertechnologies.us

Tamper Evident Security Solutions for Ultimate Protection

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

23 ms

Resources Loaded

500 ms

Page Rendered

971 ms

About Website

Visit tampertechnologies.us now to see the best up-to-date Tamper Technologies content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about tampertechnologies.us

Discover high-quality tamper evident security solutions. Customised tamper evident tapes and labels for ultimate product and brand safeguarding.

Visit tampertechnologies.us

Key Findings

We analyzed Tampertechnologies.us page load time and found that the first response time was 23 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tampertechnologies.us performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

82/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.8 s

30/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.002

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.1 s

99/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tampertechnologies.us

23 ms

tampertech.com

169 ms

lazyload.min.js

11 ms

TamperTech-Logo.jpg

7 ms

half-void-1-1024x1024.jpg

9 ms

Our browser made a total of 18 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Tampertechnologies.us, 94% (17 requests) were made to Tampertech.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (169 ms) relates to the external source Tampertech.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 401.6 kB (47%)

Content Size

846.2 kB

After Optimization

444.7 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript

In fact, the total size of Tampertechnologies.us main page is 846.2 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 472.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 401.4 kB

  • Original 472.7 kB
  • After minification 462.1 kB
  • After compression 71.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 401.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 370.3 kB
  • After minification 370.3 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tamper Technologies images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 205 B

  • Original 3.3 kB
  • After minification 3.3 kB
  • After compression 3.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

12

After Optimization

12

  • Images
  • JavaScript

The browser has sent 12 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tamper Technologies. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

Accessibility Review

tampertechnologies.us accessibility score

97

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

tampertechnologies.us best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

tampertechnologies.us SEO score

100

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tampertechnologies.us can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tampertechnologies.us main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Tamper Technologies. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: