Report Summary

  • 20

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    37% of other websites

  • 66

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    83% of websites

tanagra.me

Tanagra | Luxury Homeware brands | Free delivery

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

2.2 sec

Page Rendered

474 ms

About Website

Click here to check amazing Tanagra content for Saudi Arabia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about tanagra.me

Discover our finest range of dining, home décor, unique gifts & more on sale. ✓Luxury brands. ✓Create & manage gift registry ✓ Buy Now Pay Later

Visit tanagra.me

Key Findings

We analyzed Tanagra.me page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 2.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

tanagra.me performance score

20

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.1 s

47/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.0 s

26/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,270 ms

19/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.659

8/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.0 s

3/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

tanagra.me

64 ms

www.tanagra.me

880 ms

enterprise.js

36 ms

css2

33 ms

global.css

124 ms

Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 79% of them (56 requests) were addressed to the original Tanagra.me, 10% (7 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cdn-eu.dynamicyield.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (880 ms) belongs to the original domain Tanagra.me.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 245.6 kB (13%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

1.6 MB

In fact, the total size of Tanagra.me main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 80% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 977.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 239.2 kB

  • Original 265.5 kB
  • After minification 265.4 kB
  • After compression 26.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 239.2 kB or 90% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 977.9 kB
  • After minification 977.9 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Tanagra images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-2%

Potential reduce by 6.4 kB

  • Original 406.6 kB
  • After minification 406.6 kB
  • After compression 400.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 50 B

  • Original 176.4 kB
  • After minification 176.4 kB
  • After compression 176.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Tanagra.me has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (49%)

Requests Now

59

After Optimization

30

The browser has sent 59 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Tanagra. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

tanagra.me accessibility score

66

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

tanagra.me best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

tanagra.me SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Tanagra.me can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Tanagra.me main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Tanagra. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: